Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 1901 - 1920 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This short essay argues that the congruence and proportionality test of City of Boerne v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:40 pm
Abstract: The Political Fourth Amendment builds on Justice Ginsburg’s recent dissent in Herring v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:10 am
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided last year in Holder v. [read post]
But fundamentally, Louisiana can only tax income that has a connection with the state and, in fairness, a taxpayer must be given the opportunity on audit to demonstrate that the dominant purpose of a particular borrowing was to produce apportionable income. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:52 am by INFORRM
It states, ‘the reports will use [the Claimant’s] case as a stark illustration of these issues‘. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed this in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, where the court stated, “While the corporation is ongoing, shares confer no right to its underlying assets. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Legal scholars have noted that “[f]rom ancient Roman times until the end of the nineteenth century, the partnership was the dominant form for organizing jointly owned business firms. [read post]
1 May 2018, 11:02 am by Hayley Evans
The Syrian Democratic Forces is a Kurdish-dominated military alliance that, with support from the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
While the Australian proposal is not the same as SOPA (the blocks would have to be approved by a court, for example), it would share many of the same dangers, such as the rubbery definition of sites "the dominant purpose of which is to infringe copyright. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:00 am by Christoph Schmon
Recent cases (Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook) have demonstrated the perils of worldwide content takedown orders. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Giorgio Luceri
On 1 February 2023, the General Court of the EU issued two judgments (T-568/21 and T-569/21 – Zoubier Harbaoui v EUIPO) on two trade mark oppositions filed by Google with the EUIPO against the trade mark applications for the signs "GOOGLE CAR" and "GC GOOGLE CAR". [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
The guidance further examines the relevance of the so called Pannu test (Pannu v. [read post]