Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 1901 - 1920 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am by Florian Mueller
However, there is no basis in U.S. law for extending the concept of "irreparable harm" to a judicial district. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Eugene Volokh
"The First Amendment accords a strong presumption of public access to pleadings and other judicial documents that 'have historically been open to the press and general public' and 'play a significant positive role in the functioning of the judicial process.'" It is well-settled that "documents submitted to a court for its consideration in a summary judgment motion are—as a matter of law—judicial documents to… [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO decision to different factual scenarios than that presented in the case decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.While the Federal District Court judges largely followed the Gallagher v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) filed a lawsuit in a federal district court in California that could determine the reach of its regulatory authority over how people use their own stem cells. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm by Stephen Wermiel
Agreeing that the court needed to intervene to protect religious freedom, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that “judicial deference in an emergency or a crisis does not mean wholesale judicial abdication. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 5:18 am by Stefanie Jackman and Rene T. McNulty
  In a very real sense, this decision has the potential to render the “model form” subject to circuit-by-circuit, or even district-by-district, variation, as federal courts interpreting the FDCPA and the final rule require disclosures not covered by the model form itself. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit overturned the district court’s ruling holding instead that the state court requirement was overturned in the Knick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:36 am by Phil Dixon
Aerial surveillance program does not violate First and Fourth Amendments; denial of preliminary injunction affirmed Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
First, a defendant must have purposefully conducted activities within the forum state, or must have purposefully directed its conduct towards the forum state. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:14 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Rodriguez filed an original petition on August 20, 2020, in the 98th Judicial District Court in Travis County, Texas. [read post]