Search for: "State v. Hughes"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Justin Hughes: Sampling problem may go away with tech. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In Jensen v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC received rather kinder treatment in a Saturday Guardian profile. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
In ruling on no-action requests, the agency staff typically issues a one-page memorandum stating whether it concurs with any of the issuer's arguments. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:44 am
Saunders v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
(Update, Friday, July 21, 2006: Welcome to readers from Opinio Juris, Hugh Hewitt, Steve Bainbridge, and a couple of other places that seem to have picked up this post. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:01 pm
And in one old case, Beauharnais v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Hugh McIntyre of Freedom is My Nationality thinks it’s the right move (his nationality is Canadian, incidentally). [read post]