Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 7:33 am
Supreme Court Decision By a 4-1 majority (Lord Toulson dissenting), the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
And the cases the Court will hear this year are noteworthy—affirmative action, voting rights, and the "independent state legislature doctrine," among others.But because I'm not a very political person, I'm interested in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Wilson and Lady Black. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
Mark Hill & Simon Lee, UK Constitutional Law Association: State, Churches and Chancel Repairs – Twenty Years On: on the twentieth anniversary of the House of Lords decision in PCC of Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
We must also conserve critical State Department resources so that consular officers may continue to provide services to United States citizens abroad. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
The Court considered R(M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) as the leading case on s.21(1). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
” Existing industry players, such as Rupert Murdoch, Lord Rothermere and Alex Springer have been touted as potential buyers, as well as sovereign wealth funds in Gulf States, such as Saudi Arabia. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:17 pm
He based this finding on the words of Lord Osborne in H M Advocate v William Frederick Ian Beggs (No2) (2002 S.L.T. 139). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Austin v- Metropolitan Police Commissioner was brought by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London in 2001. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am
In reaching this view, Mr Justice Knowles referred to Hansard – admissible in these proceedings given the ambiguity of the primary legislation – which recorded that during a debate in the House of Lords on 24 October 2000, Lord Falconer of Thoroton stated that the words “or dignity” were proposed to be added to paragraph 3(b) by amendment to ensure “that the exemption applies to the granting of peerages”. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:58 am
It is not for a UK court to go further into that conclusion, said Lord Mance, which may yet be challenged in further United States litigation. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:04 am
We posted recently on the case of Holder v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:51 am
In the courts: Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011): Secret foreign nationals detention policy which contradicted published policy was “serious abuse of power”. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm
Tuitt—Nonhuman Rights Project v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
Underlying all of that is a challenge to the broad understanding and application of the lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
