Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 19,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 5:24 am
Kaull v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 11:51 am
United States (common law adoption)* State Courts BulletinCases featured:Williams v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:26 pm
State of Utah (Utah, May 18,2016) (declaring unconstitutional the Labor Commission's sliding fee schedule for attorneys representing injured workers because the Utah Constitution explicitly grants exclusive authority to govern the practice of law to the state supreme court, which "undoubtedly" covers the regulationof attorney fees)*Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
I've now had a chance to read the Fifth Circuit's opinion in SEC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:24 pm
DENHOLTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.; DENHOLTZ MANAGEMENT CORP.; PARKSIDE PARTNERS, L.P.; MARK FLANNERY; JOSEPH MAYO; STEVEN CASSIDY; and BRIAN MCMURRAY, App. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
Below are excerpts taken from the Summary of the Argument and the introduction to the Argument in the amicus filing by Mark Lemley and other professors. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
The next edition has two really notable opinions, Mark Breakiron v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:51 am
Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm
Utah State Charter School Board (10th Cir., December 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Board because its members were entitled to qualified immunity)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jackson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
WAGES*Evans v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm
ERISA and Employee Pension Plans*Romstad v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:54 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Milam v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:42 pm
Moniz (10th Cir., December 6, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Moniz on Dye's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims because the undisputed evidence showed that Dye chose to retire)Labor Unions*United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
” These “Marks” included “all ‘Camellia Grill’ marks on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office” and “all ‘trade dress’ associated with the ‘Camellia Grill’ Restaurant,” as well as blueprints, menus, and recipes. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
In The Patissier LLP v Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd [2019] SGIPOS 10, the Applicant (The Patissier LLP) sought to revoke the mark(“Subject Mark”) registered in the name Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd, on the ground of non-use under S 22(1)(a) and (b) of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:33 pm
Inc., v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
