Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 1901 - 1920 of 4,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Joshua Matz
”  Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic provides “5 quick takes” on the federal government’s brief. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In March 2009, Ms Shoesmith commenced judicial review against OFSTED, the Secretary of State and Haringey Council. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 1:31 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 (See here for a quick sketch of the background law at the federal and California state level.) [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:39 pm
I haven't blogged recently about the Ninth Circuit's blockbuster computer search and seizure decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:04 am by Orin Kerr
  On a very quick read, it seems that the weird mandatory rules part of Judge Kozinski’s initial en banc majority opinion in CDT is now just part of a Kozinski concurrence to what has been relabeled a per curiam majority opinion. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:04 pm
Ford Court of Appeal May Have Been Too Quick on the Trigger in Buell-Wilson Post-Opinion Order Court of Appeal Denies Petition for Rehearing in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:19 am by MacIsaac
This morning I was doing some quick research on the law of “agony of collision” and turned to my favourite practice guide for a quick answer. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:20 am by Fiona de Londras
These cases can take a few forms the most common of which are individual complaints (individual(s) complain that the state in which they reside/which exercised control over them violated their rights under the Convention), inter-state complaints (one state complains that another member state violated the Convention). [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Deeds not words: Let's have some action on prisoners voting rightsRobert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has to extend voting rights to sentenced prisoners in England and Wales. [218573]Bridget Prentice: Following the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of Hirst v. [read post]