Search for: "State v. R. E. J"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
§ 14-2801(J), (M). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
§§ 4651–4660–A (2010), against the landlord of that building, see Blackhouse v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Bellamy, Sara E. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Marchant, Gary E., Douglas J. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 1:10 pm
., Delhi v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Slow but steady on access to environmental justice from supreme court Filed under: Art. 5 | Right to Liberty, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case comments, Children, Costs and Procedure, Immigration/Extradition, Mental Health, Social Care Tagged: Bahta & Ors, G v E & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 939, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
The EarthGrain Co. k/n/a Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Reservation of right to appeal claim construction prompting stipulated judgment does not create substantial controversy as to declaratory judgment counterclaims: The Fox Group, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
-Adrian J. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
Traditionally, cases that mentioned full forensic imaging of hard drives began their captions with United States v. or State v. because they were criminal matters. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
Sch. of Law); (2) Ricardo J. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
NOLON, PATRICIA E. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
NOLON, PATRICIA E. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:39 pm
July 5, 2011, Jones, J.), United States Middle District Judge John E. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
Jackson, Barbara E. [read post]
