Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 13,689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2021, 8:48 am
United States is, however, not about the classification itself. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
The Board erred by failing to consider whether the registered BROOKLYN BREW SHOP mark has acquired distinctiveness for beer-making kits. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm
Register today for the live virtual program. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:13 am
IndiaX v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:08 am
Its shares are not listed and do not trade on a registered national securities exchange. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
You can register for the webinar here. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 9:10 pm
The public can register and create an account for free to log in the platform. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
See Ozaltin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am
The state of the register alone is not sufficient evidence – it all comes down to use in the market. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 5:02 pm
Mad Dogg was the originator of the indoor Spinning market back in the early 1990s (it owns the registered TM on SPINNING and SPINNER). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:10 am
From the Court's per curiam opinion in Yovino v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:28 pm
United States and Kahn v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The other conditions - namely, that the rights to the sign were acquired prior to the date of application for registration of the EU trade mark, and that the sign confers upon its proprietor the right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark - were to be considered in light of the criteria set out by the law of the Member State governing that sign, so UK law.The relevant UK provision (section 5(4) of the Trade Mark Act 1994) provides that a trade mark shall not be registered where… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Unicolors v. [read post]
