Search for: "State v. Richard" Results 1901 - 1920 of 8,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2014, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses a recent article by Erin Morrow Hawley in which Hawley suggests that, in its June decision in Burwell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Reis, Judge.The State appeals from an order obtained by producers of films that registered for state tax credits directing that the films’ final budget summaries be kept confidential. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Courthouse News Service, Barbara Leonard looks at Murphy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” For National Affairs, Joel Alicea and John Ohlendorf write that New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman looks at one aspect of “the sentencing fallout from” Sessions v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
United States, which made Nixon accept his guilt in the Watergate controversy by also accepting the pardon. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
   In Slate, Richard Hasen ponders whether Citizens United allows for foreign spending on American elections. [read post]
State Board of Equalization, 191 Cal.App.4th 1259 (2011) and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
”  At Forbes (and cross-posted on the Washington Legal Foundation’s blog The Legal Pulse), Richard Samp discusses another case on the January 10 Conference, Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
Nihamin is a principal of plaintiff professional corporation, which is a party to the action (see CPLR 2106; Samuel & Weininger v Belovin & Franzblau, 5 AD3d 466 [2004]; Richard M. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
From last week's decision in Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc. v. [read post]