Search for: "State v. Self" Results 1901 - 1920 of 15,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
Bolton (which we’ll talk about on Thursday), and the other in State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:24 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
In addition, a growing web of animal welfare laws at the federal, state, and local levels, not to mention ever strengthening norms against animal cruelty, might give the Nutcracker pause, perhaps convincing him to call in the local animal control agents rather than resort to deadly self-help. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:52 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Supreme Court issued a 5-4 opinion in the case Coleman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
In its 2-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Beyond those limits, federal common law or federal statutes, not a self-serving body of state law, must fill the void. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:30 pm
  So unlike an actual trial court judge, Polsky's self-interest is definitely at stake.Sure, Polsky's got lots of other potential arbitration parties. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:57 pm
The ruling came in McCane v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]