Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Is ‘Privacy’ a Means to Protect the Competition or Advance Objectives of Innovation and Consumer Welfare? [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
"Programs such as UP's help protect a company's brand, but the railroad didn't need protection from the model industry, he said. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm
" The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit just held its Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
All it would mean is that the particular patents Apple is claiming either don’t hold up under careful scrutiny or, if they do, that HTC is found not to have infringed them. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 am
Long story short, Edwards winds up the worse for it. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
" We've come up with a couple of alternatives. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Br. 9, and informed Demetrice that she could either mail the petition and summons back to Moss or that Moss would have them picked up. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
In Kahl v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Proper disclosures can manage this risk.A Historical FTC Perspective: Advertorials, Infomercials, and Paid Endorsement Lesley Fair, Staff Attorney, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC Settlement: FTC settled with Munsen Specialty Co., in vol. 1 of FTC decisions, 1917—deceptively promoted high tech product through content that didn’t look like ads. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
Scherer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:38 am
Jing * Announcing DoctoredReviews.com, a Website Against Doctors' Efforts to Squelch Online Patient Reviews * "Consumer Reviews of Doctors and Copyright Law" Talk Notes * CA Anti-SLAPP Cases Involving Consumer Reviews as Matters of Public Concern * Dentist Review on Yelp Gets Partial Anti-SLAPP Protection--Wong v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am
Antitrust law, after all, protects competition and, as the Supreme Court pointed out in Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 pm
From Riseandshine Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm
On March 26, 2012, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) filed an amicus curiae brief in Rosenfield v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
While “public concern” wasn’t always the crucial metric for whether speech is entitled to protection, it plays some part and even a central role in public employee cases. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:30 am
Dudley v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
Viacom International Inc., v. [read post]
