Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 1901 - 1920 of 49,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Steve Hall
AMERICA locks up too many people for too many things for too long, largely due to the prevalence of mandatory-minimum sentencing laws. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
Metropolitan News-Enterprise: California S.Ct. grants review in People v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
Reasonable people will disagree about whether state courts ever have to hear any class of federal question lawsuits without respect to their jurisdiction over comparable state-law claims, and the Supreme Court has assiduously avoided answering that question. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
I have no doubt that the Federal Assembly will support the constitutional laws on the accession to Russia and the establishment of four new regions, our new constituent entities of the Russian Federation, because this is the will of millions of people. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
"  Yet, as Mike and I explain, it is well within Congress' authority both to repeal or reduce a tax, and to offer people a lawful choice between maintaining insurance and doing nothing. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by NARF
Ho-Chunk Nation Executive Branch (Tribal Law; Sovereign Immunity; Ho-Chunk Nation Legislature)U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by NARF
Mael (Housing; Emotional Distress; Tort Duty) People in Interest of Jay J.L. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm by Thomas James
VIP Properties) The Court revisited the question of how the First Amendment applies to trademark law in 2023, in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
To these principles, it should be added that although ordinarily words may mean different things to different people, the law of defamation operates a legal fiction that words bear only a single meaning. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by Ronald Mann
We want people to be secure in knowing which laws we are going to apply, not what the substance of those laws are, but which law is going to apply. [read post]