Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2020, 2:49 am
("HCI") sought a concurrent use registration for the mark HANSCOMB CONSULTING & Design (shown below) for various business services, covering the entire United States except for two geographical areas (Hinsdale, Illinois and Los Angeles, California). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:32 am
” The question before the Court is “[w]hether a final judgment in favor of the United States in an action brought under Section 1346(b)(1) of the Federal Tort Claims Act, on the ground that a private person would not be liable to the claimant under state tort law for the injuries alleged, bars a claim under Bivens v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
This week marks the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 8:00 am
Case date: 21 June 2024 Case number: No. 23-50413 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:06 am
United States (PDF). [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
Mehta of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia resolved the DOJ's motion in two steps. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:07 am
In today’s connected world, infringers can take advantage of U.S. commerce from outside the United States. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:40 am
Global Traffic Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2006, 4:41 pm
Groumoutis believed that "use" meant "made," he could not have believed that the marks were used in the United States because Opposer's clothing items were not made in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
Ed. 2d 497 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm
” To establish priority of use, a party must show that its owns a mark or trade name previously used in the United States and not abandoned. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland and the United Kingdom both submitted third-party comments in TV Vest v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
This is a question that is being studied including by the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) which launched an investigation into issues associated with patenting artificial intelligence inventions. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
This is a question that is being studied including by the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) which launched an investigation into issues associated with patenting artificial intelligence inventions. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
Nearly ten years ago, in 2013, the United Nations adopted a resolution designating July 30 as World Day Against Trafficking in Persons. [read post]
