Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1901 - 1920 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 3:53 am
Bergsman).Genericness of CHINOOK for Beer:  The United States Department of Agriculture (ars.usda.gov) identifies Chinook as a hop varietal. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm by Aubrey Mandus
La Boom Disco, Inc., 955 F.3d 279, 283-84 (2d Cir. 2020); Marks v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm by Aubrey Mandus
La Boom Disco, Inc., 955 F.3d 279, 283-84 (2d Cir. 2020); Marks v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
One type is head-of-state immunity, which attaches only to the individual recognized by the United States as the formal leader of the country. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
The Board had ruled that Petitioner Australian Therapeutic lacked standing because it had agreed not to use or register the mark NAKED for condoms in the United States, and further had agreed that Respondent could use and register the mark, and so Australian did not have a real interest in this proceeding or a reasonable basis for its belief of damage. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
If he thinks the prison at Guantanamo still has a role in national security or that it provides some benefit to the United States, I welcome his views. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:38 am by Dennis Crouch
The consideration for the contract is Petitioner’s agreement not to use or register the NAKED trademark for condoms in the United States and Respondent’s agreement not to use or register the NUDE trademark for condoms. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:04 am by Thomas K. Lauletta
Case date: 05 August 2020 Case number: No. 19-1547 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]