Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 6,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 11:49 pm
And don't miss the all-star video that goes with the post.Cracked has The Six Most Terrifyiing Malpractice Cases Ever (h/t Ed.)A Staten Island ferry crash victim gets an $18.3M award after his lawyer, Evan Torgan, turns down $10M. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
The central problem is the fact that a decision can only truly be identified as minimalist, if it may be compared with hypothetical alternative reasoning and outcomes (i.e. if we don't know what other options the Justices had, how can we say their chosen path was more minimal than alternatives?). [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:01 am
"I don't think there's any excuse for that kind of crude and cruel language," he said. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:12 am
And if they don't, does the court exercise its discretion to find a way to make sure such a mistake doesn't happen again? [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 6:20 am
Again, we don't have the trial evidence in this ruling, but the harassment must have been awful for plaintiff to quit and for the jury to find that she had no choice but to resign. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:36 am
Of course we don’t, but that was the veiled message being touted by Vander Platts and company as they delivered a large dose of fear mongering to Iowans in favor of removing judges from Iowa's highest court. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
You don't have the element of intentionality you had when a purveyor of obscene materials knew what was being loaded on trucks and where the trucks were going (Tulsa, San Francisco, Milwaukee, etc.). [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:06 am
"We deal with real people whose lives and freedom are on the line by what we do or don't do. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:02 am
"[T]otally inconsequential" defects in removal papers don't deprive federal courts of jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:12 am
We disagree only rarely, and just at the periphery of those issues.I believe Epic would speak out even more strongly and clearly in favor of Microsoft's acquisition of ABK if Sony wasn't a shareholder (5% or so) and the PlayStation a key distribution channel. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:10 am
The Journal opts for high dudgeon here--"Liberals claim they are only fighting for "due process," but they are doing so for foreign enemies who want to kill innocents and don't deserve such protections. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
We can do 50,000 gallons per week.Eric Small August 6th at 11:27 AM:Thank you so much but we don't pay more than competitors usually less..Kristin Ford August 6th 10:30 AM:You must've misunderstood me. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:18 am
Epps' piece, especially his conclusion (we're sorry, eminent domain abuse, as bad as it is, is not quite as bad as concluding that a class of people are simply incapable of being citizens because they are somehow lesser humans -- that's just repugnant), we don't buy in wholly to his reasoning. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
We don't need anymore unethical lawyers. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 4:07 am
That they don't reflects the problem with having a great slogan without the backing to make it happen. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
We don't do that because we are psychologists or social workers or personal counselors who can help them with their mental illness. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:00 am
I don't think three months is that unusual, though I agree they probably should have pushed it a little quicker. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
Although I didn't look on Westlaw, I don't know of a situation where someone has been held in coercive contempt for waivering during a mediation. [read post]
U.S. Dept. of Justice finds Google's Supreme Court petition in Oracle case flawed, recommends denial
26 May 2015, 11:41 pm
I don't know anyone who would disagree. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:10 am
We must say no. [read post]
