Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 6,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2022, 12:00 am
That early draft was no defendant-friendlier than the version that was finally adopted (it didn't even recognize third-party interests as an element of a proportionality defense, for instance). [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 9:25 am
Whatever you might think of federal judges, our new audience definitely doesn't aspire to rival Dworkin's Hercules, but they are  -- pace public choicers--  often interested in the public good. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Good job.But if the truth be told, I don't think she had to do this. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:11 am
We don't know, despite all the voir dire gurus, whether a juror is capable of understanding. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:01 am
"I don't think there's any excuse for that kind of crude and cruel language," he said. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 1:08 pm
The Austin Statesman ran a feature this week on how recent protests are putting more pressure on the city manager to remove Chief Brian Manley, though regular Grits readers won't find much there they don't already know.Remembering George FloydGeorge Floyd's funeral is today in Houston, his hometown. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:19 am
End of story: While I don't think 48 months was warranted, or that it will deter anyone else, at least the judge didn't remand him. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:09 am
The problem is that these rulings don't make the papers. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:36 am
Of course we don’t, but that was the veiled message being touted by Vander Platts and company as they delivered a large dose of fear mongering to Iowans in favor of removing judges from Iowa's highest court. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
The PD's won't do it because, well, every PD in the country has discussed this option, and it's never happened and it's an impossible conspiracy to coordinate.Yes, if every case, or even a few percentage points down from the current 98% of cases that don't go to trial, went to trial, the defense bar would own courtrooms and judges would be begging the prosecutors for better offers. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:54 am
" Regarding a prolonged guilty plea colloquy, where the defendant appears to have had some confusion about the mandatory minimum, (and the judge said some strange things about "whether you are or not subject to the ten year mandatory minimum, I don't know. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:05 pm
Copyright plaintiffs don't seem to view things this way, and resist every single adverse decision issued by judges. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
The central problem is the fact that a decision can only truly be identified as minimalist, if it may be compared with hypothetical alternative reasoning and outcomes (i.e. if we don't know what other options the Justices had, how can we say their chosen path was more minimal than alternatives?). [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 6:47 am
Most lawyers don't file frivolous cases because they know that jurors and judges will throw them out of court. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
" and I was reminded of the meme featured to the left of this post (or maybe the top of it if you're on a phone, I don't know). [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:51 am
” What that imminent charging might be, we don’t learn. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 4:07 am
That they don't reflects the problem with having a great slogan without the backing to make it happen. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 6:42 am
Go here for more information.Austin gets new police monitorI don't know the new Austin Police Monitor, but the last one, Margo Frasier, was the best we ever had. [read post]
U.S. Dept. of Justice finds Google's Supreme Court petition in Oracle case flawed, recommends denial
26 May 2015, 11:41 pm
I don't know anyone who would disagree. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 6:35 pm
We don't need to look under every stone. [read post]
