Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 29,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court has issued its decision in the case of CTS Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
The case cited far and away the most times in the lower court is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:27 am
Hearing the case in question, Satish Ragde v State of Maharashtra, on appeal last week, Justice Pushpa Ganediwala, sitting on the Nagpur Bench of the High court, held that there must be “skin to skin contact with sexual intent” for an act to be considered sexual assault under Section 7 of POSCO. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
ShareTuesday’s argument in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
[More on Taylor et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:45 pm
I am of the belief that a majority of the justices on the Supreme Court -- perhaps even all of them -- are not as similarly concerned as Judges Noonan and Reinhardt about fairness. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 7:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:15 pm
The court decided a range of historic cases that significantly expanded as well as contracted our fundamental freedoms. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 7:30 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm
By now, it is well past 10:30, and the courtroom is silent and somber. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Thankfully, GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy will soon be reporting on the Court of Appeal's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy where the Court upheld Mr Justice Arnold's construction (see the first instance report by wonderful Kat friend Amy Crouch here). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
The Court of Appeal Decision Unsurprisingly the Court of the Appeal upheld the substantive decision of Mr Justice Eady. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
Since then Scott and other advocates walked the floor at Parliament House (home of the Faculty of Advocates and the Court of Session) waiting to be hired. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:48 pm
In the Court’s recent decision in Blueford v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:48 am
Even if strict compliance were the applicable standard, the trial court met this standard as well. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:56 pm
In the previous post, we critiqued the decision of the Supreme Court in Icomm v PSWSSB (11 March 2019). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
For example, in R. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
"The Court held in R.A.V. v St. [read post]
