Search for: "Abid v. Abid"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Oregon: so far this year, the only legislative enactment to constrict the rights of law-abiding gun-owners. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:31 am
School Dist., 295 AD2d 683, 684 [2002] [citations ommitted]), and a breach thereof is material if it is “so substantial that it defeats the object of the parties in making the contract” (Robert Cohn Assoc., Inc. v Kosich, 63 AD3d 1388, 1389 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; accord Accadia Site Contr., Inc. v Erie County Water Auth., 115 AD3d 1351, 1353 [2014]; Fitzpatrick v Animal Care Hosp., PLLC, 104 AD3d 1078, 1081 n 4 [2013]). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
So long as responsible, law-abiding adults may purchase handguns in California, the First Amendment prevents the State from enforcing Section 26820’s ban on on-site handgun advertising. [1] See Bigelow v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Wade, Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:25 pm
As the article was going to print, a new case on the topic, Blumberg v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:08 am
Green v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:30 am
In the 19th century, Plessy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:15 am
Laifer fraudulently induced it to make its second $300,000 investment based on his allegedly false promise to abide by the 2006 operating agreement and letter agreement. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
United States Liability Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
Photo credit: A businesswoman getting booted from her job // ShutterStock Raven Skye Boyd Maurer and attorney Joyce Nanine McCool were friends. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
Apparently, County of Riverside v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:43 am
In the case of Sanon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:00 pm
Skokie and Hurley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
So the Ninth Circuit held last Friday in Jones v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm
When Congress orders an agency to begin regulating an industry, but says it should do so only if “appropriate and necessary,” the agency must take costs into account before it issues any orders, according to the ruling in a group of cases under the name Michigan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 pm
Katzenstein v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
As the four dissenting opinions make abundantly clear, today’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:05 pm
See People v. [read post]
