Search for: "Arthur v. Arthur" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A “Fare” Shake? Ninth Circuit Affirms Judgment On the Pleadings for San Francisco In Removed Action Challenging SFMTA’s 2018 Taxi Regulations, Remands for Consideration of Whether to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Amend CEQA Claim
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Court Gives Two Thumbs Down and Voids Non-Compete in Actor’s Agreement
20 Apr 2016, 11:04 am by Robert B. Milligan, Daniel Joshua Salinas and Amy Abeloff
Last year’s decision in ITN Flix, LLC v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Is Robust and Disruptive CEQA Reform Possible?  Senator Scott Wiener Wants to Find Out – His Proposed SB 607 Would Exempt Rezonings Consistent With Approved Housing Elements, Limit The Scope of EIRs for Qualifying “Nearly-Exempt” Projects, and Greatly Strengthen Negative Declarations and Categorical and Statutory Exemptions
4 Mar 2025, 3:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Rejects Coastal Act/CEQA-Based Challenges To Commission’s Certification of San Diego Port Plan Amendment As Time-Barred For Failure To Join Indispensable Parties Within Limitations Period
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Kuhn v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
ARTICLE: Show Me The Money: Medicare Liens and Personal Injury Matters
26 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In Dailey-Console, Judge Arthur L. [read post]
Tort Talk - http://www.torttalk.com/
Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Delia Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
General Global Week in Review 18 May 09 from IP Think Tank
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Law and Media Round Up – 3 October 2022
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Ask the author: Paul Moke on Earl Warren — The man & his measure
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Powell v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Fifth District Holds Cap-And-Trade Program Compliance Supports Refinery Project EIR’s Conclusion That GHG Emissions Are Less Than Significant, Also Addresses Important CEQA Baseline and Railroad Operation Preemption Issues
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Ask the author: The people surrender nothing
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
I note what must be new discussions of Citizens United v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
When CEQA Gets Ugly: Third District Holds Lay Public Opinion Supports Fair Argument That Project May Have Significant Aesthetic Effect Requiring EIR
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Georgetown Preservation Society v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
this week’s edition
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” Week of April 26,  2010: In Favor of the State or Government Thomas Douglas Arthur v. [read post]
Capital Defense Weekly - http://www.capitaldefenseweekly.com
Law and Media Round Up – 28 May 2018
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and three Resolution Statements from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 18923-17 Dixon v The Sun, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20931-17 Dixon v Sun.co.uk, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00918-18 Dixon v Mail Online, resolved via ISPO mediation 00916-18 The Scottish Government… [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Executive Order B-30-15 And CEQA GHG Analysis: Evolving Uncertainty At The Intersection Of Law, Policy And Science
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm by Arthur F. Coon
., Friends of Oroville v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A “Capitol” Offense: Third District Holds State Capitol Building Annex/Visitor Center Protect EIR Violated CEQA Due To Inadequate Project Description And Analyses Of Historical Cultural Impacts, Aesthetics, And Project Alternatives
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Holiday Break Federal Lawsuits Filed – COMPLETE LIST
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
  Paul v. [read post]
Intellectual Property, Business, and Bankruptcy Blog - http://assoulineberlowe.wordpress.com/
“Baseline” Basics: Second District Rejects CEQA Challenge To Hollywood Hotel Project MND Alleging Unanalyzed Human/Housing Displacement Impacts Because Plaintiffs Relied On Incorrect Environmental Baseline
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities (HERO) v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
State Lands Commission’s CEQA Review of SF Bay/Delta Sand Mining Project Approval Is Adequate, But Fails to Fulfill Obligation to Consider Public Trust Doctrine
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm by Arthur F. Coon
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com