Search for: "Attorney Goldstein"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
1 May 2015, 1:08 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, in a high profile case that did not make our watch list — Goldstein v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Former Attorney General Janet Reno and current Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano are victims of this confusion. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in M&G Polymers.] [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in Dollar General. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Goldstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Tags: Beneficial owners, Corporate Transparency Act, Disclosure, Financial regulation, FinCEN, LLCs, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Transparency When a Company Takes a Stand, What is the Board’s Role? [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in DIRECTV and among the counsel to the petitioner in Samsung. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:21 pm
Attorney of United States, 7 F. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
[Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners on this case. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in POM Wonderful and among the counsel to the petitioners in City of Arlington. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:32 am
Texas, 21-1601Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals erred in holding that the prosecution’s reliance on admittedly false DNA evidence to secure petitioner’s conviction and death sentence is consistent with the due process clause of the 5th Amendment because there is no reasonable likelihood that the false… [read post]
