Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2025, 2:00 pm
It points to the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Rendell-Baker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
App. 2006); Baker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
” In 2000, another high-profile case (Waldrep v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 3:11 pm
After 88 minutes of hearing, in the high-profile civil rights case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am
Look no further than the primary establishment clause case the state cited: McCreary County v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:20 am
Rendell-Baker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 1:53 pm
Baker, 84 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:06 pm
In Crooks v. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 3:06 pm
Frank Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:50 am
’” Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
But the argument bombed in a moot session and ultimately attracted only the vote of Justice Denise Johnson in Baker v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2025, 11:14 am
Souter also clearly delineated the boundaries between church and state in Hurley v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:56 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the justices held that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” under the appointments clause, who have to be appointed by the president, a court or a department head; they predict “interesting times ahead for the Administrative State. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:09 am
In re Baker, 294 B.R. 281 (Bankr. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 am
Baker (1999) 20 Cal. 4th 23, 31-32. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:36 am
Baker, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 128 S. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
” In its second podcast, More Perfect looks at “the dramatic long-term results of the little-known Baker v. [read post]
