Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 1921 - 1940 of 4,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
United States (2015) said "the critical question is not whether the unrelated investigation occurs before or after the officer issues a ticket, but whether conducting the unrelated investigation prolongs -- i.e. adds time to -- the stop. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The entire statement is reprinted below: Supreme Court of the United States Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:37 am by Barry Sookman
Our Federal Court recently granted an injunction in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 am by NCC Staff
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:29 am by Anonymous
Code database includes complete coverage of the United States Code back to its inception in 1925. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
"  How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
About 75 percent of the public transportation customers in Montgomery were black, and they remained united for more than a year, as the boycott crippled revenues for the bus line. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]