Search for: "Christians v. Christians"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 5,947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
UPDATE: Commenter David Schwartz offers a different approach: Betz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:45 pm
Jo Christian Oterhals / flickr The second Apple v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
Since the Board of Appeal decided to take a different view from the one adopted in previous decisions, in relation to the reputation of the earlier mark, it should have provided an explicit statement of its reasons for doing so.This looks familiarPhoto: Christian HolmérAs a result, the Court found that the Board of Appeal’s assessment as regards the application of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 to be "vitiated by several errors or lacunae, relating to the… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Mead v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 6:11 am
In Adams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:50 am
In Sherley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:15 pm
Today in Weinbaum v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 2:14 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:05 pm
In Joyner v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 5:55 pm
In Eweida v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
In Doe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
A group of private landowners ended of 2017 with a Montana Supreme Court ruling, in Atlantic Richfield Company v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:45 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From BK v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:20 pm
The most historic may prove to be Cooper v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
The Chief Justice calls Zubik v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:49 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 9:10 am
The suit complains of access to clergy, religious classes, congregate worship and Ramadan observance, and of favoritism to Christianity in holiday decorations.In Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
LEXIS 133014, July 9, 2013), and dismissed a Christian inmate's complaint that regulations barring him from wearing his wedding rings in jail violated his free exercise and equal protection rights.In Scott v. [read post]
