Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional Integrity" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
     Public resistance to integration efforts in the 1950’s explains why the state of Alabama became desperate to get rid of the NAACP. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
     Public resistance to integration efforts in the 1950’s explains why the state of Alabama became desperate to get rid of the NAACP. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm by Sean Dugan
And to that end, zealous party members will scuttle electoral integrity through manufactured controversy and pretense. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:18 am by Rosa Schechter
Calabro, President and CEO of Florida TaxWatch, explained: “As an integral part of our mission to educate taxpayers and citizens, Florida TaxWatch has been conducting analyses of the likely impacts of proposed Constitutional Amendments for more than three decades, and I know that this independent analysis will help Floridians judge the potential benefits of this Amendment. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am by Cormac Early
McGinnis has a new post in a four-part series on Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:30 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
If the Alberta experience is indicative of the approach that might be taken federally, the result will be an expansive interpretation of what might constitute a real risk of significant harm. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
American constitutional practice reflects persistent mistrust of the power of government institutions and a desire to devolve power to individual citizens whenever possible. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:35 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
But, the fact remains that a citizen is afraid to go to Police Station in this country and a citizen is also afraid to approach Courts except the Constitutional Courts as justice is quickly delivered still by the Constitutional Courts. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:29 am by Dan Gauss
As Bloodsworth said, “If a country cannot ensure that they won’t kill an innocent citizen, they shouldn’t kill at all. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:14 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The exclusion and resulting decrease in jury diversity has potentially negative effects on the jury’s decisionmaking and its institutional legitimacy, and it excludes many residents who may be integrated into the community for many other purposes. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by The Charge
  The Fifteenth Amendment guaranteed the right of all citizens to vote (okay, in theory it guaranteed all citizens the right to vote…)  These two constitutional amendments acted to limit sovereignty of states regarding property rights, humanity, and how to determine democratic representation in the federal government. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm by Erica Goldberg
Texas had to wait until some significant segment of the populace supported integration and gay rights, respectively. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Bullock, a five-Justice majority threw out a century-old Montana law banning corporate campaign contributions in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Bullock, a five-Justice majority threw out a century-old Montana law banning corporate campaign contributions in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Bullock, a five-Justice majority threw out a century-old Montana law banning corporate campaign contributions in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The government says it has a compelling interest in preserving the integrity of military medals. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm by Lovechilde
The Roberts Court gave us Citizens United, which struck down longstanding limits on corporate political spending. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm by Stefan Passantino
Bullock, the Supreme Court affirmed the principle that its Constitutional analysis must be applied throughout the country and is binding even upon those state courts which may disagree with that analysis: The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
In foreclosure cases, lawyers who swore to uphold the United States Constitution and to never misrepresent facts and evidence to our trial courts lie with regularity and purpose. [read post]