Search for: "Cornell v. Cornell"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 8:23 am
That's the title of Cornell Law prof Michael Dorf's latest column at FindLaw.com, concerning last week's Supreme Court order in the Troy Davis case. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:04 am
Check out the Cornell Legal Information website, see how many District Courts post their opinions on their public websites, but not Oregon. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
I submitted to the SEC yesterday a comment letter on behalf of a bi-partisan group of eighty professors of law, business, economics, or finance in favor of facilitating shareholder director nominations. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For example, in Nixon v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week in Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:59 am
We are pleased to have Faith Stevelman begin a series of six posts today on Berger v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
& Life Sciences at Cornell Univ., 4 NY3d 225).As the Court of Appeals said in Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr. v Signor, 5 NY3d 435, "An agency's records are presumptively open to public inspection, without regard to need or purpose of the applicant" and "FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:11 am
Cornell & Sons, Inc., 09-1184 (E.D. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
There has been some discussion, for example, about whether or not there needs to be an equal number of check boxes on each side (favoring fair use v. disfavoring fair use) in order for the checklist to itself be fair. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
Pleasant Grove and Salazar v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:48 am
DeStefano [Cornell LII [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:59 am
"13 In addition, under State Farm v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
For a good portion of this opinion, based upon its tone and content, I thought that Justice Cornell was going to hold that the gang enhancement here was proper. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Cornell U)As written about Terry v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:16 pm
Viens (Queen Mary, University of London) The Neuroscience of Fair Play: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Altruistic Behaviours and Their FailuresDonald Pfaff (Rockefeller University, New York) Brain Images As Legal EvidenceAdina Roskies and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Dartmouth College) 13.15 LUNCH 14:15 SESSION III: The Illusion of Intentionality and Its Implications for Criminal LawColin Blakemore (Nuffield Department of Clinical Sciences, Oxford University)… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
Federal Election Commission [Cornell LII backgrounder] on whether Austin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Cuomo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:13 am
The Court ruled 5-4 in Ricci v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
