Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 48,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
According to this Advertiser piece, the chief justice and the governor are not seeing eye to eye on cost cutting. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Sanchez v Duarte, 2022 WL 1540581 ( N.D. Texas, 2022)
22 May 2022, 6:50 am
See Guaragno v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 5:38 pm
Newman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:29 am
In Salesin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:02 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003 Federal Court Judge Middleton decided the penalties arising from his decision in ASIC v Healey as follows: The CEO Scott has been ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a penalty in the amount of $30,000 plus a share of costs; the CFO Romano George Nenna is disqualified from managing corporations for a period of two years from 4.30pm on 10 October 2011; the applications for relief for… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:25 pm
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 7:29 am
Additional Resources:Bogner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hilcorp Energy Co., 2016-C-2181 (2017). [2] See e.g., XXI Oil & Gas, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hilcorp Energy Co., 2016-C-2181 (2017). [2] See e.g., XXI Oil & Gas, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hilcorp Energy Co., 2016-C-2181 (2017). [2] See e.g., XXI Oil & Gas, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:39 am
Si la administración deniega la asistencia, y se ve obligado el funcionario a recurrir en vía contencioso-administrativa, caso de ganar su derecho a resarcimiento por sentencia contenciosa [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
Baker v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:07 am
Assn., v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Law Request v City of New York, 191 AD3d 504, ruled that where the custodian of the records [Custodian] had "no reasonable basis for denying access" to the records sought pursuant to FOIL, it was undisputed that Petitioner substantially prevailed" as Custodian, during the pendency of this proceeding, "disclosed the records sought in the FOIL request with limited redactions. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Law Request v City of New York, 191 AD3d 504, ruled that where the custodian of the records [Custodian] had "no reasonable basis for denying access" to the records sought pursuant to FOIL, it was undisputed that Petitioner substantially prevailed" as Custodian, during the pendency of this proceeding, "disclosed the records sought in the FOIL request with limited redactions. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
Adamah v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 7:35 am
The threshold problem with Judge Cain's opinion in Louisiana v. [read post]
