Search for: "Doe Corp 1-20" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
Charge filed by Painters District Council 35; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am by John Bolesta and Keahn Morris
A case in point is the massive unfair labor practice proceeding lasting three years between the NLRB and McDonald’s Corp. based largely on the conduct of McDonald’s franchisees. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Second, as stated, the rule that there’s no © in works “(1) created by judges and legislators (2) in the course of their judicial and legislative duties,” leaves open what happens if the works are created by lobbyists and then incorporated into law, or if they’re made part of the law like building codes drafted by private parties. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
: RealNetworks, Mattel and Hasbro copy the infringer by creating online Scrabble: (IP ThinkTank), Creative Commons Statement of Intent for Attribution-Share Alike Licenses released: (creativecommons.org) Events IP Business Congress – 25-26 June, Amsterdam: (IP Business Congress), INTA annual meeting – 17-21 May, Berlin: (IMPACT), Australia: IPRIA / CELRL / IP Australia: Employees’ IP and the employment relationship – incentives to innovate… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” [1] The Court further noted that disclosure policy embodied in regulation is “not without limit. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
In a previous Client Alert, [1] we discussed a decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissing a stockholder suit that alleged breach of fiduciary duty by directors who initiated, but later abandoned, a sale process that had generated three attractive offers. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
It is the only country of the 134 surveyed that reached the top 20 in ten separate metrics. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Philips Electronics North America Corp., 489 F. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
The trial judge, however, neverreached this conflict in the facts, because he ruled strictly on legal grounds: namely (1)that section 2923.5 does not provide for a private right of action and (2) section 2923.5 ispreempted by federal law. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
 the Supreme Court of British Columbia: noted that the definition of “improvement” is inclusive and can bear meanings other than those included in section 1 of the B.C. [read post]
  A case demonstrating this point is RS Electric Corp., Case No. 14-CA-260142, where Advice concurred with the dismissal of a charge complaining about [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
But by 5:04 ET, the Supreme Court’s press corps had received further extensions of the administrative stays from Alito—putting SB4 back on hold. [read post]