Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
Holder, 133 S. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:00 am
This writer sees this as a common sense approach, since financial loss does not in itself encapsulate all possible losses suffered, with future losses possibly suffered through the prejudice to the work or its reputation. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:12 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Broadly stated, he does not view minors as holders of rights, and puts a lot of stake in parents (specifically a “nuclear family”) to protect the interests of the child. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
Licks Attorneys--the firm that according to my research has represented patent holders in all (23) information and communications technology patent infringement cases in Brazil so far--kept on fighting and got an unusually soon hearing date (December 6).The key rationale on the STJ's part was that there is no reason why PIs should not be granted over SEPs (with the FRAND pledge being deemed a matter of contract law that does not weigh against injunctive relief), and to… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
He reasoned that transferring user data from overseas servers to Google’s data center in California “does not amount to a ‘seizure’ because there is no meaningful interference with an account holder’s possessory interest in the user data. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
But when the EU does something right, I'll acknowledge it. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:33 am
Crocs, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
WPIX v ivi Billed as “the first internet cable network,” ivi launched in 2007. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm
Until 2013, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in a case called Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
How does the statue of limitations and its exceptions apply? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm
In Matulich v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Holder, 10-545 (which had been relisted twice). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
Garner through Scott v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:31 am
Does that term make anyone wince? [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Holder case in 2013) to be outdated and thus unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:36 am
Of recent cases, National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:07 am
Google and Authors Guild v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:06 am
” A “trademark owner does not necessarily ‘own’ all combinations of marks using its principal word,” Scholastic Inc. v. [read post]
