Search for: "English v. State"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 6,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 8:48 am
The case, incidentally, is Stevenson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:21 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
He speaks virtually no English. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
On 19 June 2015, Ms Romanova broke her silence by sending a letter to the Court stating that the she could not engage with the proceedings for various reasons, including a limited ability to speak, read and write in English (meaning she had to rely on Mr Kozlov for translations), an impecunious financial position and an inability to obtain pro-bono representation or conduct the litigation in person. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[v] Both Canada[vi] and New Zealand[vii] quickly claimed victory. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:35 am
Earlier this week, while covering the Fordham Law v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:18 am
Advanced Display Technologies of Tex, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
The English court appears more reluctant to grant standard IP remedies to patentees where the cause of action is actually a breach of contract. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 10:20 am
" United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
Sari and Nasu’s argument is predicated on the fact that Article V of the treaty does not expressly require a request or advance consultation for the exercise of collective self-defense, and that a related 1960 exchange of notes (also available in English) expressly exempts operations conducted under Article V from requirements for “prior consultation” that otherwise apply to major changes in the presence of U.S. troops, equipment, or facilities in… [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:29 pm
Constantin Films v UPC is pending in the CJEU. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:58 am
On December 8, 2011, the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Whistleblower v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
