Search for: "Federal, Inc."
Results 1921 - 1940
of 57,569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
The dispute arose between HIP, Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:51 am
” Sampson, 83 F.4th at 422 (quoting Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Comm’n, “Bear in the Woods,” Remarks Before the Investment Company Institute (May 25, 2023), https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/gensler-remarks-investment-company-institute-05252023#_ftnref27 (noting that “[c]ollective investment funds are estimated to be $7 trillion, $5 trillion at the federal level and $2 trillion at the state bank level”). [2] See Lia Mitchell, Morningstar Ctr. for Ret. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
Airlines, Inc., 13 F.4th 240, 246 (2d Cir. 2021). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Office of Federal Acknowledgment (Unreasonable-Delay Challenge; Federal Recognition) In re: Eagle Bear Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:56 am
In Apple Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:40 am
In 2006, Chutter, Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:45 am
As previously reported, we saw this play out this year with the impactful NLRB decision in Stericycle, Inc. that has upended employer handbook policies. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Allgenesis Biotherapeutics Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Allgenesis Biotherapeutics Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
”Believing that such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed its lawsuit (EEOC v Tesla, Inc., Case No. 4:23-cv-04984) in U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Sandoz Inc., 678 F. 3d 1280, 1289 (Fed. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Sandoz Inc., 678 F. 3d 1280, 1289 (Fed. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:49 pm
The post Federal judge dismisses some charges against opioid distributor appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
In Systems Plus, Inc. and Phoenix Data Security, Inc., GAO sustained protests filed by 91 offerors challenging their elimination from the competition, because the solicitation required the agency to validate each offeror’s self-scores and “the lack of documentation, combined with misleading and contradictory explanations regarding how the validation occurred, precludes us from finding that the phase 1 evaluation was reasonable. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am
Jude Medical S.C., Inc., 30 F.4th 1339, 1343–44 (Fed. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:11 am
” In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 545 F.3d 304 (5th Cir. 2008). [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 9:59 am
Axonics, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Supreme Court on Monday denied certiorari to HIP, Inc. in a case that asked the Court to review the U.S. [read post]
