Search for: "GORDON v GORDON"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm
Gordon Brothers/Hilco actually began the going-out-of-business sales at all of Anchor Blue's stores late last week. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:14 pm
This is one of a long line of losses by plaintiffs who seem to have made it a part of their business to seek out and sue people to send them unsolicited email (see Gordon v Virtumundo, Mummagraphics, etc.). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:21 am
v=u0lPuN03b40 Dr. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
In this week’s case (Jackson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:54 am
Motorist William Gordon was traveling slightly ahead of Ms. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:54 am
Gordon was also named as a defendant in the case and participated in the settlement. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Beckerman, 126 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1987), and Muller v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
"Gordon-Darby Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
According to Kime, neither Gordon nor any other member of plaintiff made subsequent offers to purchase the entire parcel and negotiations with plaintiff ceased. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0251, 2010 MT 275, JAMES and CHRISTINE GORDON, Petitioners and Appellees, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
In Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd [2001] NLJR 970 Coleman J held: “26. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
A property owner is subject to liability for a defective condition on its premises if a plaintiff demonstrates that the owner either created the alleged defect or had actual or constructive notice of it (see Betz v Daniel Conti, Inc., 69 AD3d 545, 545; Roy v City of New York, 65 AD3d 1030, 1031; see also Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
Gordon argued that the Bankruptcy Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter because of Marshall v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
In Gordon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
In Gordon v Town of Queensbury, 256 AD2d 784, the Appellate Division held that the probationary rules set out in a collective bargaining agreement trumped the probationary rules set in the regulations of the responsible civil service commission.The court rejected Michael Gordon’s claim that his termination by the Town of Queensbury before he completed his probationary period was made in bad faith because the Town failed to give him the written pre-termination notice… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm
If true, it would be difficult to see how the prosecution could secure a conviction in light of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Dora the Explorer Suit settled Supreme Court Denies Cert in Harper (innocent infringer) file sharing case Maverick Recordings v. [read post]
