Search for: "German v. State"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 6:00 pm
It claimed it was bound by a prior precedent, Webb v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
Much of the commentary around on Trump’s proposed national emergency has focused on the framework set out in Justice Robert Jackson’s deservedly famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:37 pm
V(1)(d) of the New York Convention. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 2:24 pm
In Buchanan v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:57 pm
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 3:59 pm
Bumper v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:15 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
28 May 2023, 11:53 pm
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
As Loreburn E. stated at pp. 320-21 in Adam v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
Call ERIC (European Research Infrastructure Consortium) (IP finance) Germany German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht): Annual report for 2008 (Class 46) German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) finds SCHLÜSEL lacks distinctiveness for locksmith and security devices and services (Schlüssel means ‘key’) (Class 46) India Confederation of Indian Industry’s conference on combating counterfeiting and… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
State Department. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:38 am
It should be remembered that in the famous case of Princess Caroline of Hanover v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Such service was not in accordance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires service on in-state defendants by a Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Zuk v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
* Alice in Patentland: a comic perspectiveSoftware patent decision Alice v CLS Bank finds its way to the world of comics thank to imaginative kat-friend Julia Powlesand Wired.co.uk. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
The pending appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
