Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 1921 - 1940 of 4,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:28 pm by Stewart Baker
Michael Vatis and I pan Justice Kennedy’s gassy ode to the “Cyber Age” in Packingham v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
A regional court in Germany has ruled that a law due to come into force in days on storing internet usage data breaks EU regulations. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
It is report that Germany will use its presidency of the G20 summit this year to call for global tech regulation. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:22 am by INFORRM
 It had to apply the factors set out in cases such as Axel Springer v Germany ([2012] ECHR 227,[89] to [95]). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:15 am
Since the Snowden revelations, we’ve learned a lot about the NSA’s expansive surveillance tools — like Upstream surveillance, which we’re challenging as unconstitutional in Wikimedia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
Germany conducts its operations in the war against the Islamic State from Incirlik. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
--> (Ancient Automobile Trinidad, Cuba 2015 Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)I am pleased to let those interested know that I have posted a draft of my essay, "The Human Rights Obligations of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:40 am
"The AmeriKat also understands that there was a case heard last week before the Supreme Court in Germany about the liability for patent infringement in Germany if the infringer "only" delivers infringing products to customers outside Germany which then might end up in Germany. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am by Roel van Woudenberg
On the other hand, the opposition division also held that O1's opposition was inadmissible and took a separate "additional decision" to this effect (see above point V). [read post]