Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 15,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2021, 11:37 am
Without unity, we’re dead already. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:50 am
In re Mercedes-Benz, at 4. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 5:34 pm
Continuing Lawfare’s discussion of the Drone White Paper, we’re pleased to publish the following guest post by Geoffrey Corn on the question of threat identification and the use of force; our thanks to him: Should We Know How We Know Who is the Enemy? [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
Sorry to all my Wisconsin friends, you’re missing out. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
The party we’re supporting is a leading music publishing company. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:49 pm
Continue reading [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 7:32 am
Continue reading [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:58 am
We shall see what develops and as always expect that our readers will have strong views to express in the comments below (bearing in mind the rules at the bottom of this post).Joint statement from the Chairman of the Administrative Council and the President of the Office 26 March 2015Call for a social dialogueThe Administrative Council acknowledges the results achieved by the Office and its staff which represent the outcomes of the Efficiency and Quality strategy adopted in 2011.The… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:10 am
We’re continuing the fight against the CASE Act, but today brings even bigger problems. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:10 am
We’re continuing the fight against the CASE Act, but today brings even bigger problems. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 3:48 am
Matthias Zigann of the same court's 7th Civil Chamber has--consistently based on what I hear from the legal community--decided to err on the side of caution and strictly enforced coronavirus prevention rules in his courtroom.At times I wonder whether certain superspreader patent judges have given consideration to a simple fact: even in Germany, which has a relatively low COVID mortality rate, one in 25 diagnosed COVID-19 patients dies. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 3:28 pm
Both the Hawaii ruling and the Maryland decision reinforce my view that Travel Ban 3.0 is vulnerable to most of the same legal challenges as its predecessors. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:22 am
The legal regime governing document preservation does not mandate special rules for periods of transition. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am
However, if the Ninth Circuit endorses the Kennedy rule in the Robertson case, it may create more legal hurdles for the Trump administration in overturning the WOTUS rule through rulemaking action. ************************************************ [1] 80 Fed. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Vestager's Apple-Ireland decision has been the most ridiculous Commission ruling to date. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:45 am
The required disclosures regarding experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of directors applies to directors who are not standing for re-election but will continue to serve following the annual meeting. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:33 am
In short-form media like Twitter, disclosures at the end may get cut off as posts are re-tweeted, re-grammed, or re-pinned. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
But most contractors and contracting officers continued to apply the “old” rules under the FAR and SBA regulations. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
But the Court’s order appears inextricably tied to an acknowledgement that Israel has a continuing right to protect itself from the threats emanating from Gaza. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:38 pm
As basic concepts such as the health and safety, human rights and civil rights of two-spirit, trans, non-binary and gender diverse youth continue to be negotiated and re-negotiated in various social, political and legal spheres, Canadian law establishes that we have a collective duty to ensure that such fundamental values are not only upheld, but are also not taken for granted. [read post]
