Search for: "In Re Brand" Results 1921 - 1940 of 14,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2015, 3:23 am by Dave Wieneke
 It starts with three brands: NASA, Travolta and Breitling. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:20 pm
If you’re looking to simplify your life, Leo Babauta has the resource you need: The Zen Habits Handbook for Life This is a brand new e-book that Leo released today! [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:42 am by Lorraine Fleck
Beer brand Sam Adams is letting Facebook fans in on the action by letting them create their own brew bit.ly/Auu6X0 via @Interbrand and @adage Nokia fined in Australia for spam-texting its own customers bit.ly/Ao7tBm Should celebrities have automatic rights to trademark registrations for their names and their kids’ names? [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  One implication: there may well be circumstances in which the brand defines its own market. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 3:42 pm
Build your vocabulary by using this brand new (and weird) word in at least 10 sentences today, but don't be surprised if someone calls the police. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:00 am by alexishall
An Intoxilizer is the brand name of the “breathalyzer” machine used in most police departments. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
English: A basic, Sharp-brand solar calculator. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:35 am
Since so much noise has been made about the UK's brand new love-it-or-loathe-it Digital Economy Act 2010, the IPKat thought he should say a few words about it. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
  To the extent they’re based on the continued marketing of the drugs, these claims are disguised stop selling claims preempted by Bartlett. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:24 am
It doesn't matter who your agent is or whether you have a record deal: if you win someone over in the brief window of time they're in earshot, they're yours. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
 I'm not sure whether they have a brand on 'em or not. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Because we’re supposed to? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:07 am by Scott Hervey
  See In re Sambado & Son Inc., 45 USPQ2d 1312 (TTAB 1997); In re Bonni Keller Collections Ltd., 6 USPQ2d 1224 (TTAB 1987). [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:41 am by Ron Coleman
You’re making stuff that officially, permissively, persuasively says HERSHEY’S on it in official lettering and the usually IP-crazy nuts over Hershey’s have no idea what on God’s green earth you’re putting out there with their name on it! [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am by SHG
It’s so very tempting, especially to a new lawyer seeking to establish his brand. [read post]
However, the court argued that re-branding would create only a brief, interim benefit by integrating Cigna’s product faster than Anthem could develop a comparable product of its own. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
There are only a handful of firms that are able to articulate a different culture or brand identify from everyone else – they’re all inner-focused, because all they want to do is think about themselves. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Sure, re-do the whole office. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"]  [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of… [read post]