Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 1921 - 1940 of 3,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
It was just not in the initial programming, but now we're taking a serious look at that and putting that as soon as we can into the next version. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:02 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
David Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1155 21st Street, NW Washington, DC 20581 Re: Request for Comment on Proposed Regulation of Off-Exchange Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions and Intermediaries Dear Mr. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:12 pm by Sam E. Antar
In my last blog post, I questioned whether Green Mountain correctly determined that its K-Cup margin error was an "immaterial accounting error" when it was initially disclosed on September 28, 2010. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:39 pm by Holly Doremus
FWS initially called on the states in 2002 to create management plans that would support delisting. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:54 am by Vincent Leonard
Every time I am told this on an initial meeting I always feel like good ole’ Charlie Brown. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Many papers on legal communication were presented at NCA 10: The 96th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, held November 14-17, 2010 in San Francisco, California, USA. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:17 am by Susan Brenner
You can, if you’re interested, read more about that in the article you can find here. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 6:39 am by Susan Brenner
The Second Circuit reached this result by examining the plain language of the Petite policy; as you can see from the excerpt quoted above, it only refers to U.S. initiated state-federal prosecutions. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  At the time the California legislation went into effect, many observers questioned whether the California Act might presage the emergence of a host of other state-level legislation as other U.S. states tried to get into the privacy-protection mode. [read post]