Search for: "Jack Doe 2" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 12:16 am
Madam," has been a continuing gadfly at the Supreme Court, challenging it on a range of issues and then suing the Court itself when it does not rule in his favor or does not take up his case. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 5:39 am
bing really does have a lot going for it ... [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:45 pm by David Luban
I don't know whether it does. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
One thing that the other side does is try to make itself as obnoxious as possible to our clients any way they can. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:05 am by structuredsettlements
Jeremy Babener does a nice job of summarizing the "voices" at the 104(a)(2) hearing on Beyond Structured Settlements. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:05 am by structuredsettlements
Jeremy Babener does a nice job of summarizing the "voices" at the 104(a)(2) hearing on Beyond Structured Settlements. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:47 am by Patrick Hindert
Dick Risk and Jack Meligan: Dick Risk and Jack Meligan both recommended that the Treasury issue regulations explicitly holding the economic benefit doctrine not to be triggered in the context of single-claimant QSFs. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:12 pm by Jordan Furlong
But for most people, the movie is best known for the HAL 9000, an artificially intelligent computer on board a spaceship that malfunctions (or does it?) [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:16 am by Lawrence Solum
Our "commitment to written constitutionalism" may mean that we are unlikely to accept an answer to that question that does not accord some role to the constitutional text. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:39 pm by John Steele
UPDATE 2: At page 25 of the Margolis Memo, the irony I identified above is expressly mentioned, although not resolved. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am by Lawrence Solum
In recent years, originalists ranging from Jack Balkin to Keith Whittington to Randy Barnett have argued in varying fashion that an originalist interpretive approach follows logically from "our commitment to a written constitution. [read post]