Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:42 pm
"Praise the Lord! [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court has this paradigm case pending before it (Morrison v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
As Lord Reid explained in that case, at p 1033, Julius v Bishop of Oxford 5 App Cas 214 is itself authority for going behind the words which confer a statutory power to the general scope and objects of the Act in order to find what was intended. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Now, in a refreshingly short and direct speech of just 37 paragraphs, Lord Sumption put things right. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
On Wednesday 23rd November, the Court will hand down judgment in the Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998 [2022] UKSC 31. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
Lord Mance, in giving the lead judgment, stated that: “the only approach, consistent with the nature and underlying purpose of these insurances both before and after the [1969 Act], is one which looks to the initiation or causation of the accident or disease which injured the employee. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
” Data Privacy and Data Protection The House of Lords will be debating an amendment to the U.K. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Isn't it wrong for me to change my opinion simply because one of the victims stiffed a drug lord? [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:17 am
The fliers stated: "WARNING! [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The judge stated clearly that the Al Rawi principles applied in the current case. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:42 pm
He cites Lord Scarman's views expressed in his opinion in R v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm
The second school of thought, and one that has found increasing favour in recent years, is that a party may be deprived of costs in relation to a head of claim on which they have lost and regardless of whether they were “unreasonable” in pursuing that head: • In AEI Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507, Lord Woolf MR stated at 1523H: “…it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
In the same case, the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) made clear that there was nothing in the UK legislation to prevent workers from taking holiday during a period of sickness absence. [read post]
