Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 4,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In light of the obvious provenance of section 4 in Flood (the explanatory notes of the Act state expressly (para 29) that “The intention in this provision is to reflect the existing common law as most recently set out in Flood v Times Newspapers”), it seems very likely that the section would be interpreted as importing in an obligation of responsibility on the part of the defendant, even though it does not state this expressly. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm
The case for argument today is Georgia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:04 pm
Rooney, Coulson, Hague: balancing privacy and expression Revisited and Updated: Strasbourg on Privacy and Reputation, Part 3 Defamation Damages: USA and England Compared Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1: The European Convention Alastair Brett – as he leaves The Times, Lectures: Lord Neuberger on the balance between privacy and freedom of expression Libel Reform Debate: Part 1 “Burden of Proof” Case Law: Political Blog Libel Action Struck out… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment, with which all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:15 am
Appellate History In 2004, Mr Durkin sought relief in the Aberdeen Sheriff Court against DSG and HFC stating that he had validly rescinded the contract of sale and credit agreement. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
The Law Lords grappled with this question in 2007 in the case of Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd ([2007] UKHL 39). [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
It is true, as Lord Phillips observed in the House of Lords’ judgment in the present case, that one of the reasons for the prohibition is that States must stand firm against torture by excluding the evidence it produces. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
Website operators in the US, who allow others to post defamatory content on their websites, can take huge comfort from a very recent decision by the New York State Court of Appeals, Shiamili v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Certainly this reasoning is supported by the authorities cited by Floyd J at [85]-[89], to the effect that even though an invention is obvious to try, it is nonetheless obvious only if it is “more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work” (Lord Justice Jacob in St Gobain v Fusion Provida [2005] EWCA Civ 177 [35]) and there must be a “fair expectation of success” (Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
In People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
On Wednesday, the UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in Al-Rawi v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:15 am
The House of Lords ruled in 2005 in the case of A & Ors v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
Speaking in an interview on the BBC’s ‘You and Yours’ radio programme, Minister of State for Justice Lord McNally said: “The Government is committed to increasing transparency, including extending the scope of the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
