Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Filed: February 27, 2019Opinion by: Judge Robert N. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
§ 1212.7(d). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Most appellate courts that have recently considered the matter have so held as to libel as well. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
” (n.14) The court held that it could not determine as a matter of law “that the effect of the ‘no switching’ agreement . . . upon the business of supplying encyclopedias and reference books is so negligible that the agreement is not a restraint of trade in such products. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 3:02 am
Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; and Tina N. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
Sara D’Attoma, University of Verona (physically) Exporting the Right to Development from Beijing to Geneva: Rhetoric and Diplomacy. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
City of Stamford, 699 A.2d 52, 55 & n.8 (Conn. 1997). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:31 pm
Thus, the Court of Appeals reasoned, the trial court was not required to take judicial notice of the report under Rule 201(d), but was free to use its discretion pursuant to Rule 201(c). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
D., IN RE: THE MATTER OF TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF A MINOR CHILD, Appellee. 1st District. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUSTS 2003-1, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2 and 2005-3.C.A. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
Ripston stated that the district court’s ruling was not the end of the matter, emphasizing that “it’s a long road ahead until final victory. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Roberts d/b/a City Auto Sales, No. 01-17-00398-CV (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Federal Express Corporation (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: $2.6 million attorneys’ fee award in $300,000 case warranted due to complexity of case and value of permanent injunction: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
In Re: Federal Grand Jury 03-01 Matter of Material Witness, No. 04-MC-9071 (D. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:35 pm
Thus, the Meyer court "decline[d] to extend Kagan to situations in which an allegedly unlawful practice under the CLRA has not resulted in some kind of tangible increased cost or burden to the consumer," and it expressly disapproved of Kagan's dictum that "'we interpret broadly the requirement of section 1780 that a consumer "suffer[] any damage" to include the infringement of any legal right as defined by section… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Ass'n, 988 F. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
D. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:01 am
§ 380:30-1-7(d). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
Last but not least, as one astute judge noted many years ago in Matter of Pappas, “[i]n the real world, particularly that in which close corporations operate, clear evidence of share ownership is often not found in the corporate books and records, for any number of reasons. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
