Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The claims as granted comprise two independent claims : claim 1 relating to a composition consisting of (a), (b) and (c).and claim 11 relating to a dietary supplement for the prevention of inflammatory processes and articular disorders consisting of an admixture of (a) and (b), wherein the wording of features (a) and (b) are identical for both claims. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:13 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
Many students are suspended or placed up for expulsion for possession of a "knife," pursuant to California Education Code 48900(b). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm by Robert Chesney
  Nothing really novel here, but I talk about our dwindling arry of detention locations, the problems Congress causes by tying the president’s hands, AUMF renewal, and related matters: Responses to Questions for the Record Robert Chesney* Charles I. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
The power and jurisdiction of the court to issue appropriate warrant against an accused on his failure to attend the court on the date of hearing of the matter cannot be disputed. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, no “fresh case” should be brought (B. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm by Randy Barnett
On the train to the City, dogs swept the train in Philly, and another K-9 team boarded in Newark to ride to Penn Station. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The claim attempts to define the subject-matter in terms of the result to be achieved: “the coating having a transparency to incident radiation of less than about 50% below the coating glass transition temperature and greater than about 50% above the coating glass transition temperature” Such a definition is not allowable in the present case because it appears possible to define the subject-matter in more concrete terms, viz. in terms of how the effect is to be… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
One of the most active catalysts was a catalyst comprised by magnesium oxide stabilised with alumina (catalyst B). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am by Venkat
The court says it's not aware of any procedure pursuant to which a third party could force NJweedman.com (f/k/a Forchion) to change his personal name. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Considering contents in this way, it could be argued that when there are two formally autonomous decisions relating to the main and ancillary aspects of the examining proceedings, it is the Board that would be competent for the main proceedings, i.e. a technical Board pursuant to A 21(3)(a) (or A 21(3)(b), as the case may be), and in particular the Board that is competent in the specific technical domain of the application, that would be competent for reviewing a decision concerning this… [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
electrons, which ligand(s) is (are) chosen from CO and NO2+; the total electron charge q of the complex to which L1, L2 and L3 contribute and the ionic charge of the metal M being positive and equal to 1 or 2; the anionic borate entity of which has the formula                in which: a and b are integers ranging, for a, from 0 to 3 and, for b, from 1 to 4 with a + b = 4, the symbols X represent: a… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
There is no definition of a degree of narrowness required from the part to be excluded in order to be the potential subject-matter of a disclaimer. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Document D1, on the other hand, failed to distinguish such carbonate-sensitive hair colouring agents from carbonate-insensitive hair colouring agent.This argument does not, however, put into question the applicability of the problem-solution approach to the present case, it merely shows that the [applicant] defined a technical problem which is not in agreement with the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm by scanner1
NATALIYA SEIDEL-JOUKOVA, a/k/a NATALIYA SEIDEL JOUKOVA, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the “disclosure status” of subject-matter individualised from lists has to be determined according to the circumstances of each specific case by ultimately answering the question whether or not the skilled person would clearly and unambiguously derive the subject-matter at issue from the document as a whole […].In the present decision, Board 3.3.02 comments this approach.The patent proprietor had filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had revoked the… [read post]