Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 8:02 am
" And in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
With the case of Graham v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The State’s “civil service” has two components: the classified service[5] and the unclassified service.[6] The Classified Service Let us first consider employment in the classified service as the majority the employees of New York State as an employer and the employees of its political subdivisions serve in positions in the classified service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The State’s “civil service” has two components: the classified service[5] and the unclassified service.[6] The Classified Service Let us first consider employment in the classified service as the majority the employees of New York State as an employer and the employees of its political subdivisions serve in positions in the classified service. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
May 16, 2008)(Majority Opinion by Don Willett) (taxation of out-of-state insurers, retaliatory tax)FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
Palmer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
In an immediate and strong response last week to eliminate the pre-emption, Senate majority leader Malcolm A. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm
Ridpath A, Reddy V, Layton M, et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:58 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
But the majority refused to go along. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm
It has always been up to the government to regulate these forms; as stated by the Supreme Court yet again from Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:32 pm
As an example, Representative Smith observed that while it is clear that the sponsor of H.R. 3190 did not intend to overrule Copperweld Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:11 am
"Based on a two-judge majority's gross misapplication of Romer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
This same battle was already fought, and lost, back in the 1980s with Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:58 pm
Next up is Lora v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Smith, in which the Court prohibited an after-the-fact referendum from interfering with a state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:02 pm
Smith of the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
" Caraker v. [read post]
