Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 1921 - 1940 of 6,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2009, 3:23 am
  Down in Columbus, several decisions, the most significant  of which was Martin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 5:26 am by Terry Hart
This week, the US Solicitor General filed an amicus brief in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands, where the Supreme Court is being asked to draw the line between the functional and the aesthetic in a copyright case involving cheerleader uniform designs. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:51 am by Steve Shiffrin
Despite the Court's infamous decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kuku, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2533 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1260 (18 November 2010) Starglade Properties Ltd v Nash [2010] EWCA Civ 1314 (19 November 2010) Tilson v Alstom Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 1308 (19 November 2010) Ingram v Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 1313 (19 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench… [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:58 pm
Conference of Mayors in the case U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 10:44 am
Martin of Sundahl, Powers, Kapp & Martin, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiff also sought to prevent officers from retaliating against him and others, claiming that an officer had raided the Wiccan locker and seized a book and a cord.In Martin v. [read post]