Search for: "P. v. Heard" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Let the names begin (Intellectual Property Watch) EPO, JPO, USPTO, SIPO and KIPO agree on work sharing initiative (IAM) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPR-Helpdesk) Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants future work to include global policy challenges (Intellectual Property Watch) End of life for IP (Securing Innovation) Royalty monetization: high-profile deals generate excitement among TTOs (Technology Transfer Tactics) Indentifying valuable… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
At common law, the words “tendency”, “likely” and “calculated to” are used interchangeably in defining the test of defamatory (see, for instance, Tugendhat J in [29] on p 1994B and D of Thornton). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:23 am by WSLL
  You should use thiscitation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:32 am by CMS
  The striking cover of the book, reproduced from the work of Isobel Williams, depicts an image of counsel for the late Tony Nicklinson addressing the Court during the appeal of R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38, the assisted suicide appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In Re P (Placement Orders: Parental Consent) Wall LJ reviewed the earlier case-law on post-adoption contact in the light of the introduction of the Adoption and Children Act 2002. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:09 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]