Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 8:25 am
In 2009, Green’s family filed a Maryland wrongful death complaint against the city of Baltimore, Del Electric Inc., and Baltimore Gas and Electric Company. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:46 pm
JOACHIMMay 7, 2010Eri Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Marketing on Hold, Inc., No. 05-0748. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The settling parties are the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
Warren City Sch., 825 F.2d 977, 988 (6th Cir. 1987) ("A sanction is generally improper where a successful motion could have avoided any additional legal expenses by defendants. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
In the fall of 2003, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
The parties selected an arbitration panel, designated New York City as the arbitration site, and stipulated that their arbitration clause was silent on the class arbitration issue. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
El Torito Restaurants, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Mar. 15, 2010; pub. ord. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
Bradford; Morrison v Circuit City Stores, Inc., 317 F3d 646 [6th Cir 2003]; Spinetti v Service Corp. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
In 1994, Garland became the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General, with responsibilities that included the supervision of the Oklahoma City bombing case and the case against the Unabomber. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
The Court apparently had been holding the case until it decided another First Amendment case involving violent expression — U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Those five Justices formed a majority to hold that the mentally retarded cannot be executed. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 5:47 am
City and County of San Francisco, 196 F.R.D. 362 (N.D.Cal. 2000), the Court noted:If the examining party asks questions outside the scope of the matters described in the notice, the general deposition rules govern (i.e. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
NASCO, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2133 (1991) (court may per inherent power assess attorneys fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive purposes); Roadway Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:57 am
Causes of Action, James Publishing, Inc., Santa Ana, CA, 2007, on the elements and Calif. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
We hold that it does not. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:36 am
Detecon, Inc., 515 F.3d 334 (4th Cir.2008.) [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
The Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement are not confidential. [read post]
