Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 2:47 am
This is the question in Phonedog v Noah Kavitz, a California case that will no doubt have an impact in Canada. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
What the victim actually knew is evaluated using a subjective standard in Montana. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
As a result, using some so-called western standard, in fact universal standards, to measure China, or even the United States, is appropriate. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
But in practice, strict scrutiny is rightly a very difficult standard to meet. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
That brings us back to Warren v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 8:54 pm
Riggs v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
RDQ attorney Rupprecht performed a propagation study using this RID standard and compared it to the PCS 700 MHz band at +27 dBm, the cell phone addressed in U.S. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:54 pm
The case is Askew v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Steno v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
Although it has not yet been required to define the term in more precise terms, the Court has nonetheless indicated that certain forms of unfairness could amount to a flagrant denial of justice. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
But our reputation standard is low. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am
This suspension power was precisely what President Obama used so effectively in reaching a deal without congressional support. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am
This suspension power was precisely what President Obama used so effectively in reaching a deal without congressional support. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Rather, they stress, they are simply asking the court to do what it has done in other redistricting cases involving allegations of discriminatory effect: announce a standard “whose precise contours are filled in through subsequent litigation. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
So where does that leave us? [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
In Odom v. [read post]
