Search for: "People v Comfort"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 4:53 pm
For example, last year, at the candidates’ lounge, I found three faculty hopefuls debating Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
” Accordingly, some people may want to vote for a 28-year-old candidate as in 1968 when activists at the Democratic National Convention tried to nominate underage Julian Bond for vice president. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
Although we had reached a certain, tentative comfort level with mediation, litigation was still the presumed means by which family law disputes would be resolved; other dispute resolution processes were simply not proper lawyering. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
This, of course, is what many people refer to as the “attribu [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
There is no reason in principle that these overlapping and intersecting concerns will align in a way that gets the right people in school, trains them in the first (and reasonable cost) ways, and puts them to work helping people and communities in need. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
A law violating a constitution established by the people themselves, would be considered by the Judges as null & void. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The voters who will be removed from registration rolls, the people who will be unable to sue large companies because of the Court’s de facto prohibitions on group litigation, the workers who will lose representation by public sector unions, and certainly the Muslims who are being victimized by a White House run amok will all feel the pain of the Court’s unprincipled hyper-politicization of American jurisprudence.To the extent that extremely comfortable and famous… [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:53 pm
People The people that have come into the author’s life clearly have had an impact. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
If it is any comfort as the debate swirls around them, Federal judges still possess one benefit that politicians so obviously lack: life tenure. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Courts might also be more comfortable with “blocking copyrights” as part of equitable relief rather than as part of difficult constitutional questions or at the liability stage. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
Put simply, natural justice involves decision-makers informing people of the case against them or their interests, giving them a right to be heard (the hearing rule); not having a personal interest in the outcome (the rule against bias); and acting only on the basis of logically probative evidence (the no evidence rule). [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Supreme Court in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:59 pm
MacElree v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Over lunch, Egilman explained to me that he considered himself a Marxist-Leninist, his term, and that the day would come when people like him would have to kill people like me, again his language. [read post]
