Search for: "People v Peters"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: PTO Director Jon Dudas announces resignation (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) (Patent Prospector) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Can accused infringers finally escape Marshall? [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
"Federalism" in this sense is a national policy of a national people that this national people could change at will through an Article V amendment or by changing the composition of SCOTUS or some other formal or informal constitutional means. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
At various times, each of these deaths has been considered divine retribution. * 64 - 67: St Peter was executed by the Romans. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:36 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
Gillian Peter
QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice
Court Denies Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Guilty Verdict For Prosecutor's Alleged Errors
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:12 am
People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 1:46 pm
Thanks, Peter!] [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:40 am
Rivera
QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice
Interrogation Twenty-Nine Hours After Arrest Does Not Render Statements Involuntary
People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(PLI) US Patents Constitutional separation of powers (Patently-O) Patent practitioner ethics update (Patently-O) Interesting claim on Big 3 patents – discussion of Detroit New editorial by James E Malackowski (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Lawyers getting patents: what should the rules be? [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 pm
Just what processes do J.P.s use - what questions are asked and what records are kept or are warrants just granted (as many people appear to think) on the nod. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog) Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons) Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
Sparf v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO releases ‘FY2008 Performance and Accountability Report’; claims success despite backlog (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) USPTO transition team appointed (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
: Ex parte Godwin (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Software should be patentable (Patent Fools) (PLI) (PLI) Software method claims: Bilski in light of Benson (Patently-O) [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
Third, the theory invokes some specific theory of the good: pleasure in the case of Bentham and Mill, the satisfaction of preferences in the case of Peter Singer. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:40 am
Peter F. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427 [2d Dept… [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 10:12 pm
However, an October 16, 2008 Eighth Circuit opinion in Elam v. [read post]
