Search for: "People v. House" Results 1921 - 1940 of 11,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro, Ilya Somin on Supreme Court case of Murr v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
Domestic abuse and Allocation scheme requirements EM, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Havering (2024) EWHC 3016 EM lived in a four bed property in LB Islington on a social housing tenancy. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In June 2020, major publishing houses, including Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and Wiley, filed the lawsuit.. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:27 am by Kristina Araya
In People v Johnson, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed sentencing guidelines for criminal sexual conduct. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
Few if any of these questions/issues are new, of course, but I'm curious to hear what people think. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Matthew Fischer
Offering those people a pathway to parole will make our system more equitable,” said Gov. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 7:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Although decided after the ICA passed, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Train v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John-Paul Boyd
We are intimately familiar with the rules of evidence, both statutory and uncodified, and understand the rationale for the counterintuitive principle expressed in Browne v Dunn. [read post]