Search for: "Petition of United States"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 23,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 7:08 am
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] and Overton v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:13 pm
On October 13. 2020, White Castle System, Inc. petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for permission to seek an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:15 pm
On August 3, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) denied a petition for rehearing en banc and issued a modified opinion, following a petition for rehearing filed by Ariosa in Illumina, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:38 pm
Our client was born in Philippines, and naturalized in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:08 am
The mother's petition was denied because she had previously entered the United States illegally and therefore was excluded from reentering for ten years. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:38 pm
United States, No. 09-820 (cert. petition filed Jan. 7, 2010) (Supreme Court docket entry here). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
I should add, in the interest of candor, that I worked on the brief and presented oral argument on behalf of the United States in Dewsnup v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:01 am
You can petition to bring your fiance to the United States with a special visa called a K-1. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Bankruptcy proceedings are federal matters, and are subject to investigation by the United States Trustee and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:16 pm
Issue: Whether the term “Indian lands” in 25 U.S.C. 81(a) applies only to land currently held in trust by the United States or also to land that will be held in trust. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:47 am
The bankruptcy case is pending as In re Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC [Case No. 15-34287] in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts published a 67 page report titled "Bankruptcy Basics". [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:43 am
On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues: IN AFFIRMING THE ABUSIVE SEXUAL CONTACT CONVICTION, THE LOWER COURT RELIED ON FACTS OF WHICH THE MEMBERS ACQUITTED APPELLANT. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 6:45 am
On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues: I. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:14 pm
On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: WHETHER APPELLANT IS ENTITLED TO NEW POST-TRIAL PROCESSING BECAUSE THE ADDENDUM TO THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE’S RECOMMENDATION FAILED TO CORRECT AN ERROR IN APPELLANT’S CLEMENCY SUBMISSION. [read post]
