Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
In I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
The University of Michigan moves to dismiss this claim, arguing that, as a Michigan state department, it is entitled to immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.The 11th Amendment provides, in relevant part: `The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State[.] [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:30 am
IMBS, Inc., 368 F.3d at 730 (citing Baker v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
The court also rejected 3Taps’ attempt to invoke the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:38 am
Harvard Enter's, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, that lower courts should look for and be guided by the “position taken by those Members [of the Court] who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds” (emphasis added). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
This criticism is closely related to similar complaints about the Court’s campaign finance rulings, especially Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
United States, 714 F.3d 1311, 1315 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The court held that the ordinance was a police-power regulatory action to which the categorical exemptions applied. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984), this Court struck down a statutory provision that limited photographic reproductions of United States currency, but exempted reproductions “for philatelic, numismatic, educational, historical, or newsworthy purposes to content that was educational or newsworthy. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:59 am
Towne Air Freight, LLC v. [read post]
