Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 7,622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Miner v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery and Amy Swearer remark Tuesday’s cert grant in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:37 pm
The court also rejected Cobalt’s challenge to the plaintiffs’ state-law claims. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that by agreeing to hear the New York gun case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
.: The Center for a New American Security will hold a discussion on state exploitation of financial networks to support weapons programs titled Financial Networks of Mass Destruction. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
" New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Judge Jed Rakoff of the United States District Court in Manhattan, a former member of the National Commission on Forensic Science, said the weakest pattern analysis fields rely more on examiner intuition than science. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Stokeling v United States, 586 U.S. ____ (2019), the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 12:40 pm
" The Tenth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am
Yesterday, the challengers in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:30 am
Once per year, [Bachotet] shall pay for travelling costs (round trip), when the children visit their father. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
In Stokeling v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
